![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Downloads Get icon software and icon graphics! perfecticon.com Professional Stock Icons More than 9999 unique icons. Low price & High quality. perfect-icons.com Standard Icons The widest variety of professionally designed, software icon collections. standard-icons.com Toolbar Icon Images Download thousands of toolbar and menu icons now! toolbar-icons.com Website Icons Search web icons. Download icon sets. perfect-icons.com |
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: ICO, BMP, GIF, PNG ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: highlighting this icon will make you look, pretige icons, checkgmail icon, how to change online now icon, logitech harmony 1000 icons"And where it you saw, that all power of the state automatically rose on Law protection? "" Well, for example, till 1985 in the USSR, only laws thenWere called as Central Committee Decisions. "And here we together began to recollect the last Life also have found out that... Any automatism in the USSR was not even if to recognise that absolute power of the Central Committee Was. Decisions on various economic and to social problems accepted one Central Committee departments, and the repressive device for punishment of infringers "switched on" another - Department of administrative bodies. Also switched on only after on most To top - on Secretary or in the Political bureau - dared, whether there was an infringement Expedient or not, considerable or not, pardonable or not. And any "Lawful", that is regular, formal ways of acceptance of this decision not Was. And infringements "for the sake of business" was as much as necessary, they were considered as valour and Sometimes even were encouraged. (Told concerns infringements at the rate of about The minister. For lower levels instead of the Political bureau read - Bureau it or District committee.) Well, well, have told to me, in the USSR of automatism was not. But after all "at them" on The legislative West it all the same is. But it has appeared, as there all not so Simply. First, the fact of infringement of the law is fixed not by legislators, and judges. Secondly, fix only at presence and under the reference of the concrete The victim (except for criminal law). Thirdly, in those countries, on Which we have got used to refer, the case law and procedure operates Law interpretation there far it is not formal. It is possible even to tell more rigidly: the big The private law part (that is the norms, not concerning relations with the power) creates Not parliament, and court. And, at last, it is necessary to recollect division ascending still to Hayek on Laws-rules and laws-commands. The first are usually turned to citizens and To not state legal bodies also contain some restrictions on them ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2017 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|